Matthias Fuchs wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > don't you think this is a little bit to shortsighted? > There are many other parameters beyond the CPU clock that could be > modified in such a way. We have some code in the PMC440 board > code that sets up the PCI sync clock dynamically dependant on > a GPIO (M66EN pci pin). So I would vote for a more generic > configuration than > by a CPU frequency parameter. Just think about this: should > 667 MHz on an EPx > always mean 166 MHz PLB clock? 667MHZ with 133MHz PLB might also be > a typical configuration (e.g. when you need 66MHz EBC clock ....). > > So what about a function that takes the complete strapping values > as parameters (I think 4 longs) instead of nothing but the > CPU frequency.
I agree that this could be much more configurable. Apparently no one has needed those options yet, as there currenntly isn't any code to reconfigure the clocks at all. I would guess most people are using an EEPROM to set things up. As for shortsightedness, keep in mind that I'm not a full time U-Boot developer. I solved a problem to get our board working and I'm happy to share the solution I came up with, but I just don't have the resources to solve a problem that someone else might have later. IMO, with the basics in this patch, it should be easy enough for anyone to modify it for additional configurations if they are needed. Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
