Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar, > > in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> Changed image_get_ramdisk() to just return NULL on error and have >> get_ramdisk() propogate that error to the caller. It's left to the >> caller to call do_reset() if it wants to. >> >> Also moved calling do_reset() in get_fdt() on ppc to a common location. >> In the future we will change get_fdt() to return success/failure and >> not call do_reset() at all. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Just to make my position clear: I expect that you negotiate new-image > related patches more or less directly with Bartek, who I consider as > kind of "new-image" custodian. > > That means that I will not track the state of these patches - if you > want me to apply something directly, please ring a bell. > > Bartek: I would also appreciate if you could merge Kumar's patches in > a local repo and then send me just a pull request when something is > ready to go into u-boot-testing (or even into mainline).
OK, will coordinate new uImage stuff that gets posted to the list, and request pulling as needed. Regards, Bartlomiej ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
