On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is no reason to icbi when invalidating the temporary stack in > the d-cache. Its impossible on e500 to have the i-cache contain > any addresses in the temp stack and it can be problematic in generating > transactions on the bus to non-valid addresses. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied, with changes required due to applying to the same spot as the INIT_RAM fix. Thanks, Andy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
