In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> >I don't think the ATA_SECT_BYTESIZE is better than
> >the ATA_SECT_SIZE.
Actually it's worse.
> The big problem here is that ata.h defines ATA_SECT_SIZE as 256 Words
> where libata defines it as 512 Bytes.
But "BYTESIZE" reads to me as "size of byte", just as if ATA sectors
used something different than 8 bits per byte.
If you need such a new definition, then please call it different.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Love sometimes expresses itself in sacrifice.
-- Kirk, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3220.3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
