On Monday 21 April 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > Intended and documented behaviour is that "go" is used to start > > > standalone applications, which are supposed to return. > > > > then how exactly are people supposed to execute their flat binaries ? > > none of > > I am not an expert for the Blackfin implementation. But "go" is for > standalone applications. The "boot*" commands are intended to boot OS > images. > > > the other boot methods allow for straight jumps that i'm aware of. > > otherwise i'm going to have to add even more bloat to add a slight > > variation on the go command: one where the documentation doesnt require > > it to return. > > That makes no sense to me. If you want to boot some OS, use a "boot*" > commands, not "go" or the like.
i'm not talking about operating system code, i'm talking about flat binary applications that run bare metal. something like "u-boot.bin" where it's just a binary blob that gets loaded and u-boot jumps to it and never returns. since "go" isnt appropriate according to you (and seeing as how none of the boot commands are appropriate), then the only next step is to implement a "jump" command that is exactly like "go" except it doesnt return. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
