On Apr 29, 2008, at 8:47 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kumar,
>
> in message  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>>> Some boards (e.g. lwmon5) need rather a frequent watch-dog
>>> kicking. Since the time it takes for the flush_cache() function
>>> to complete its job depends on the size of data being flushed, one
>>> may encounter watch-dog resets on such boards when, for example,
>>> download big files over ethernet.
>>
>> is this because the size argument being passed to flush_cache is well
>> beyond the size of the cache itself?
>
> Yes - the thing is that after a TFTP download flush_cache() is called
> for the size of the downloaded filr; this may be 8 or 32 MiB or  more
> ;-)

Seems like we should have a max flush size that is know to flush the  
whole cache.

Something like:

void flush_cache (ulong start_addr, ulong size)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_5xx
         ulong addr, end_addr;
        size = MIN(MAX_CACHE_SIZE_TO_FLUSH, size);
        end_addr = start_addr + size;
...

oh well.

- k

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to