"Remy Bohmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it is nicer too, but that appears to me as a good thing to > investigate for the next release of U-boot, not changing this on the > deadline of the current release.
Yeah, I completely agree. We probably need some time to shake out any fallout from such a change...your change does nothing but fix the problem, so it is much more appropriate at this point. Haavard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
