On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 10:38:35AM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote: > Sascha, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 10:29 AM > > To: Menon, Nishanth > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Patch 2/4] U-Boot-V2: ARM: introduce CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATION > > > > CONFIG_RELOCATABLE on powerpc means something different. On arm we start > > U-Boot by running it at an address != link address and _copy_ (not > > relocate) ourselves to the address we are linked at. On powerpc real > > relocation is done if CONFIG_RELOCATABLE is enabled. > > Hence the option you wanted to add should better have the name > > CONFIG_SKIP_COPY_TO_SDRAM or something like that. > Hmm.. good point. My ignorance on ppc is kicking me ;).. I will remove the > SKIP_COPY part from my patch. Couple of questions: > a) Are we ok with removing dependency of ARM from "config SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT" > in common/Kconfig (as opposed to my patch in which I moved it to > arch/arm/Kconfig)? Considering that it is used: arch/m68k/cpu/start-mcfv4e.S
so SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT would depend on CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_INIT_LOWLEVEL? > > b) Further am wondering if it is fine to convert ARCH_HAS_INIT_LOWLEVEL to > CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_INIT_LOWLEVEL in common/Kconfig and make it arch independent? ok Regards Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry ----------------------------------------------------------- Kontakt-Informationen finden Sie im Header dieser Mail oder auf der Webseite -> http://www.pengutronix.de/impressum/ <- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
