On Thu, 8 May 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > > Of course, your solution will work with multiple, different SPI > > > controllers while mine won't, but is that really necessary? > > > > > > Your solution comes with more error checking as well, which might be a > > > good thing, but since it comes with a cost of additional memory and > > > flash footprint, I think it should be optional. Maybe we could provide > > > some library functions to simplify the drivers that want this? > > > > I see. Well, I don't have a strong preference. So, either we need more > > votes, or the one who implements it decides:-) > > That was two pros - did I miss any cons ?
I think, those were two pros - but for two somewhat different solutions. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
