Hi Kim, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Tue, 13 May 2008 15:41:06 -0500 > Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> >>> static int nand_dump(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, int only_oob) >>> { >>> @@ -73,9 +74,9 @@ static int nand_dump(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, int >>> only_oob) >>> while (i--) { >>> if (!only_oob) { >>> printf( "\t%02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x" >>> - " %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x >>> %02x\n", >>> - p[0], p[1], p[2], p[3], p[4], p[5], >>> p[6], p[7], >>> - p[8], p[9], p[10], p[11], p[12], p[13], >>> p[14], p[15]); >>> + " %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x\n", >>> + p[0], p[1], p[2], p[3], p[4], p[5], p[6], p[7], >>> + p[8], p[9], p[10], p[11], p[12], p[13], p[14], >>> p[15]); >> Still exceeds 80 characters on the last line. > > or use lib_generic/display_options.c:print_buffer()
806b4da8: ff ff 01 10 00 00 05 01 ........ or ff ff 01 10 00 00 05 01 The 806b4da8 is a address RAM address and has nothing to do with the nand offset. I think the last printout is better. Morten ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users