In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> 
> Yes, but get_timer() is not guaranteed to return 0 to MAX_ULONG, as
> far as I can tell.

I'm not sure what you mean by that statement.

> On MIPS (even after my CFG_HZ patch), get_timer() will only return
> 0 to 14316 on a 300MHZ machine, as the 32-bit MIPS tick timer that
> forms the MIPS time base wraps to 0 after 14.316 seconds.

That's a bug in the MIPS implementation, then.

> Well, then we've got a big problem on MIPS.

A fixable one, I hope.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The nice thing about  standards  is that there are  so many to choose
from.                                           - Andrew S. Tanenbaum

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to