On Tuesday 03 June 2008, Scott Wood wrote: > Grant Erickson wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion. That solved it. As an academic exercise, is > > there any practical reason a system would want to use nboot, as I > > erroneously chose to do, without .i|.jffs2|.e? > > I don't think so, though I don't know the history involved. Does anyone > actually use the non-block-skipping versions of any of the nand commands > (intentionally, that is)? If the answer is no, then we could make it > the default.
I'm fine with making bad-block-skipping the default. I never used the "other" version and I don't know what it's really useful for. Best regards, Stefan ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===================================================================== ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
