On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:13:32 -0500 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, I was mistaken about my code being committed into the > official u-boot tree. Please see my response above.
Ok, I figured it must be something like that. That said, I take it this means that we have not two but _three_ drivers for the same hardware floating around in various trees, all of which are forked off the original avr32 driver. I think this is another reason to get those drivers merged together ASAP. I also hope that we can get your MMC+ support into the common driver eventually, with proper attributions and copyrights of course ;-) but I think the merge needs to happen first. I suggest we start with the three patches I posted moving the avr32 driver into drivers/mmc, then make the minimal set of changes necessary to support AT91 and Diopsis, and then start adding additional features from the other drivers, like MMC+ and SDHC support. The first two steps should certainly be doable in time for the next merge window. I suspect MMC+ and SDHC support needs more testing and review, but it may be doable as well. Does this sound like a good plan to everyone? Haavard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
