On lun, 2008-07-07 at 16:59 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
....
> > +
>
> What a nightmare of data and code. So many magic numbers, so much
> potential for errors. And for what? Just for I2C support in U-Boot?
>
>From your PoV you are right.
> Are you really sure you don't simply want to use the bit-banging
> driver?
>
I just extended the fsl_i2c.c driver that already uses a precomputed
table to setup the fsl i2c. I haven't invented these values but just
copied from the 547x and 5445x manuals. Furthermore, the h/w i2c is more
accurate that the simple bitbanging.
my 2cents.
luigi
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
--
______ Luigi Mantellini
.'______'. R&D - Software
(.' '.) Industrie Dial Face S.p.A.
( :=----=: ) Via Canzo, 4
('.______.') 20068 Peschiera Borromeo (MI), Italy
'.______.' Tel.: +39 02 5167 2813
Fax: +39 02 5167 2459
Ind. Dial Face Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.idf-hit.com GPG fingerprint: 3DD1 7B71 FBDF 6376 1B4A
B003 175F E979 907E 1650
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
