vb wrote: >> What Grant suggests is the way to go. I do not think your approach has >> chances for mainline. >> > > I am sorry to hear this, especially since what I suggest would be > completely compiler agnostic and would allow to avoid some of the > limitations one must follow today while adding stuff to u-boot. > > cheers, > /vb
As an alternate approach, perhaps this is something that might be explored in the framework of the so-called "U-Boot V2" effort? Specifically, if you can demonstrate it working, that would hold much more weight. You know, "Show me the code."! :-) jdl ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
