Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2008, at 6:15 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>> Dear Kumar Gala,
>>
>> In message <B10531D5-A045-4A60-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>> I'm adding a "boots" command that implements sub commands. Once I
>> I saw it. Actually I don't like it. Why didn't you stick with the
>> original plan to implement subcommands as part of bootm ?
>
> Can you be more precise about what you dont like. Just the new
> command, how its implemented, or something else? Also, what plan did
> we agree on?
>
> I choose a new command because of my concern about how to distinguish
> the sub-command from a FIT identifier. But it looks like that might
> not be an issue.
Hi Kumar,
The command "boots" is already taken.
$ grep loads common/*.c
[snip]
common/cmd_load.c: "loads - load S-Record file over serial line\n",
Best regards,
gvb
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
