On 22:26 Mon 08 Sep     , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
> 
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > Fix e-mail in copyright
> >  lib_mips/Makefile          |    4 ++
> >  lib_mips/bootm_qemu_mips.c |   76 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> Why do we need a completely separate implementation for the bootm
> command? If this is a true emulation, using the same kernel interface,
> we should also be able to use the exactly same bootm code?

Unfortunaltely not, the qemu_mips have it's own implementation.

To simplify it, I've prefer to sepate them.

Best Regards,
J.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to