Just my two cents worth... On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Jerry Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bartlomiej Sieka wrote: >> There are two aspects of a TFTP transfer involving timeouts: >> 1. timeout waiting for initial server reply after sending RRQ >> 2. timeouts while transferring actual data from the server
> Are seconds an appropriate scale factor for the timeout? Using tenths > (thousandths?) of seconds seems much better for allowing timeout > choices. (Thousandths could cause problems with clock tick resolution > and is unnecessarily fine grained. Gut feel is tenths of seconds is I would have thought that milliseconds would be the most appropriate choice (milliseconds being an SI unit and most timeouts I have seen have been defined in milliseconds) - If it is going to be a problem at the lower level, you can always divide by 10 (or 100) when you actually implement the timeout functionality. I just think at the user level it should be seconds or milliseconds Regards, Graeme _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
