Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar Gala, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> This version: >> * cleans ups issues pointed out by Jerry >> * adds a state machine to the command processing >> * adds bd_t and cmdline process on linux for ppc > > Thanks a lot. > > I'm still missing the possibility to use longer sub-command names, and > code to parse these in a sane way.
[snip] > Anyway, as mentioned before, I do not like to be restrricted to one > letter subcommand names - we would rather sooner than later come up > with names that nobody can remember. But They All Do It That Way (typed with a whine). > Maybe we can extend find_cmd() (in "common/command.c") to take an > alternative command table (for the sub-commands) and reuse the > existing code? > > [And then probably do this also for some other commands that take > subcommands..] BINGO, now I understand your objection. :-) > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk Best regards, gvb _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
