Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear richardretanubun, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> Please disregard V2. V1 is correct, except for this change: > > So you will submit a V3? I am not so sure about it.
This patch came to be when I wanted to make it convenient for using u-boot to test a platform with six eth interface without the need of an fdt. However, I seem to have sparked a discussion of a larger scope than I expected. :) Everyone's comment seems to indicate that streamlining is needed for the network code. I'd hate to muck the existing code some more with more copy-paste just for convenience's sake. However, if you are ok with V3 being "V1 minus the common/cmd_bdinfo.c #if defined(CONFIG_HAS_ETH0) hunk" then I can post this version. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > > Cheers, - Richard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
