Dear Gary Jennejohn,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Yes, but I did this part first because it's small and easily generated.
> Since it also affects net I wanted to get it to the custodian. The other
> part adds the console multiplexing and isn't directly related to this.
If the other patch is unrelated, you should not number thse patches
so they look as if they ware two parts that belong together, and in a
certain sequence.
Normally I would not even read the 2/2 part before 1/2 was posted.
> Not a bad idea. I think it would be most logical to do it in the
> netconsole code, rather than moving up the network initialization.
>
> I'll take a look at that.
Mee too.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No problem is insoluble.
-- Dr. Janet Wallace, "The Deadly Years", stardate 3479.4
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
