On Monday 20 October 2008, Timur Tabi wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > dont wait ... it'll be a bit before i post it, so it'll be easier if i > > just rebase against that > > If I post the patch that assumes that that i2c_reg_read() passes 1 instead > of 0, it'll break blackfin.
no it wont. as i said, the code that's in there today is broken. you cant break what's already broken. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
