Dear Alan, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > Last time Scott Wood suggested to use nand_spl you replied "I think using > > nand_spl is the best approach, but it will needs more effort to complete." > > and "Anyway, right now we can have iMX31PDK booting with this code as an > > option for users willing to use U-Boot in this board." So, what's the > > status of this effort? If this your new submission, which still doesn't > > use nand_spl is not really targeted for upstream merge, I think, it would > > be better not to mark these mails "PATCH". Or have I missed anything? > > > > This patch is just a rebase of previous patch, to be merged on > u-boot-arm/master repository.
It will not be merged to arm/master ... > I don't have nand_spl working until now. ...because we are waiting for nand_spl code. > I am new sending patches to u-boot mailing list. So what is the > problem when calling it of "PATCH"? Please, let me know about my > mistake, can you explain about it? The problem is that we told you we will only add code that fits intop the existing framework, i. e. nand_spl Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] As long as we're going to reinvent the wheel again, we might as well try making it round this time. - Mike Dennison _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot