Dear Gary, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:59:39 +0200 > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_IO_MUX) > > > +/** Console I/O multiplexing *******************************************/ > > > + > > > +static device_t *tstcdev; > > > +device_t *console_devices[MAX_FILES][MAX_CONSARGS]; > > > > please use a list_head instead > > > > This is an excellent suggestion. Thanks!
I understood that you would repost a new, modified patch which uses this suggestion, but I haven't seen any repost sice. You know that the merge window is open right now - do you plan to repost this stuff any time soon? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct. My own feeling is that it is not crazy enough. - Niels Bohr _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
