Dear Jens, In message <49489b37.9020...@tqs.de> you wrote: > > Because I'm neither familiar with qemu nor with svn I can't do that > with little effort (installation, familiarization, etc.). Beside that,
Actually you just have to check out and run it - that does not require an in-depth understanding or long learning curve. > how could a virtual machine simulate the real bus access with it's > bus timing? If I'm right in this point, only testing on another > architecture is possible, but no performance test. Indeed. But it is a very important data point to know that your patch does not break the CFI driver on as many architectures as we can test; and neither you nor we hve allthat many boards available as real hardware, so simulated machines fill an important gap. > Shortly, I will get a TQM8548 with Samsung Flash. It's a top boot > system, but also has a 2x16 Bit Flash connection. For my part, I can > only offer you a test on this board. Well, you probably could test in on a TQM8260 as well, which has a 64 bit bus (4 x 16 bit). And you should have access to trab and cmc_pu2 and TQM5200 / TQM5200s and TQM834x and TQMA31 so you actually test it on a much wider range of boards than most of us. > Stefan, as the CFI custodian, how is your procedure to check such kind > of common code patches? We ask the people who have access to real hardware to test on their boards, and we accompany that by tests on simulated hardware. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, however, there is. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot