On Dec 16, 2008, at 5:47 PM, Liu Dave wrote: >> was code breaking or just fixing it up to match the docs? > > not break the system, because the bit[55] is reserved zero for > e500/e500mc. > so just fixied it to match the e500/e500mc docs.
Ok. I'd prefer we just expand the field to 0x3ff to match the EREF spec since the upper bits are reserved we'll always read them as 0 so no harm. And we dont have to change the code again in the future if we expand into those upper bits. - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
