I also found another non-working stick.... This one was also a first generation USB 2.0 stick.
But anyway - It seems like you guys has done a great job and made usb mass storage useful! A few non-working sticks is good enough for me :-) Best regards Pål Bakken > From: Remy Bohmer [li...@bohmer.net] > Sent: 2009-01-15 13:03:20 CET > To: Paal Bakken [pabak...@online.no] > Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [plagn...@jcrosoft.com], > u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Problems with USB mass storage on at91sam9263 > > Hello, > > > So - I'm willing to rest my case :-) BUT there is something strange, since > > the "bad" stick works fine in Linux and Windows... > > -Any ideas about possible reasons for the difference? > > There has been many improvements to the USB stack lately that at least > it works nowadays on these cores. > However, there are still a number of bugs to solve, so we are not there yet. > Besides, the USB stack only supports a single device at a time, and > does not really support hotplug, it is a completely different USB > stick than Linux is currently using. > The FAT driver also only supports read-only. > > So, you cannot really compare the U-boot USB stack with the Linux/Windows > stack. > It shows, however, that there are still bugs in the U-boot USB/FAT code. > > > -Is there any specific known requirements for the sticks (except for FAT) > > FAT32 and VFAT should also work, but if I knew the exact > 'requirements', I also knew how to solve the bugs... > > > Kind Regards, > > Remy >
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
