Hi Simon, On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Graeme, > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > From: Graeme Russ <graeme.r...@gmail.com> > [snip] > > diff --git a/examples/standalone/Makefile b/examples/standalone/Makefile > > index baaa2fb..7c1ea5c 100644 > > --- a/examples/standalone/Makefile > > +++ b/examples/standalone/Makefile > > @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ $(ELF): > > $(obj)%: $(obj)%.o $(LIB) > > $(LD) $(LDFLAGS) -g -Ttext > $(CONFIG_STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR) \ > > -o $@ -e $(SYM_PREFIX)$(notdir $(<:.o=)) $< > $(LIB) \ > > - -L$(gcclibdir) -lgcc > > + -L$(USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC) -lgcc > > This forces all archs to use a private libgcc here, right? Is that the > intention? It seems to break some of the powerpc boards with my > Eeep - no, that was not the intent. I did this so long ago I can't even remember why I did the USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC > eldk-5.2.1 toolchain. I'm not sure of the runes to get U-Boot to > compile with a 64-bit toolchain. I think it might be best to > completely get to the bottom of this rather than applying part of this > patch. > > So please can you point me to the x86 compiler you tested with? > All my building is done with the latest gcc the ships with Fedora 17 (can't recall the version off the top of my head) Regards, Graeme
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
