Dear Graeme Russ, In message <CALButCJqp4CPvpwc_ri9fp6tcd=Az-7Si=fmmc0adwbhmdt...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > I agree. While gd->arch does look a bit 'ugly', it immediately unlocks > the path forward to unifying the init loop. The x86 board.c would be a > good start (IMNSHO) by simply making the init sequence arrays extern. > From there we can tackle what really needs to be in gd and what can > simply be run of the mill global variables. I think most of what is > under gd->arch may just 'fall out'
OK, it seems I have the weekest arguments. I will not fight about that. But I would definitely like to know exactly how much we pay for in terms of code size. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Program maintenance is an entropy-increasing process, and even its most skilfull execution only delays the subsidence of the system into unfixable obsolescence. - Fred Brooks, "The Mythical Man Month" _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
