On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Peter Tyser <pty...@xes-inc.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 00:19 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Mike Frysinger, >> >> In message <200903121901.23433.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote: >> > >> > On Thursday 12 March 2009 15:49:06 Peter Tyser wrote: >> > > Update include search path so that the includes in U-Boot's include/ >> > > directory have precedence over system includes. This allows crc32.c >> > > to use U-Boot's zlib.h header which removes the previously required >> > > symlinked zlib.h. >> > >> > this seems pretty risky. the headers in include/ are pretty much for >> > u-boot. >> > making those with the host headers seems like it's doomed to failure. >> >> Indeed. >> >> Full NAK from me, too. > > So what's a good fix? U-Boot's crc32() prototype uses uint32_t while > the standard zlib uses ulongs (It looks like Mike tried to keep U-Boot's > zlib.h header in line with the standard zlib.h, but then resorted to > using uint32_t's a year ago: > http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot-us...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03726.html > ).
Take a look at 20a14a42a25f72e379f38460b8a8484667536795 Basically, modify the tools to explicitly go after the u-boot version of the header when that is the desired behavior. Andy _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
