On 1/23/2013 1:48 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 23/01/2013 00:48, Troy Kisky wrote:
On 11/10/2012 12:28 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 23/10/2012 04:40, Troy Kisky wrote:
This series tries to separate the mii regsisters
from the ethernet registers as suggested by
Andy Fleming. Then, mx6qsabrelite is changed
to find the phy address from the possibles 4-7.
The V3 series is very different from V2.
Troy Kisky (9):
doc/README.fec_mxc: add documentation
net: fec_mxc: delete CONFIG_FEC_MXC_MULTI
net: fec_mxc: change fec_mii_setspeed parameter
net: fec_mxc: have fecmxc_initialize call fecmxc_initialize_multi
phy: add phy_find_by_mask/phy_connect_dev
net: fec_mxc: use fec_set_dev_name to set name
net: fec_mxc: only call phy_connect in fec_probe
net: fec_mxc: get phydev before fec_probe
mx6qsabrelite: search mii phy address 4-7
Hi Joe,
board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/mx6qsabrelite.c | 24 +++-
doc/README.fec_mxc | 27 ++++
drivers/net/fec_mxc.c | 164
++++++++++++++-----------
drivers/net/fec_mxc.h | 2 +-
drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 128
+++++++++++--------
include/configs/m28evk.h | 1 -
include/configs/mx28evk.h | 1 -
include/configs/sc_sps_1.h | 1 -
include/netdev.h | 7 ++
include/phy.h | 3 +
10 files changed, 227 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 doc/README.fec_mxc
Patches are assigned to me in patchworks. Do you have any issue with
this patchset ? If it is ok for you, I will apply it to u-boot-imx.
Best regards,
Stefano
Who should I pester to see some progress on this ?
Hi Troy,
you're right, this patchset stalls - but on the other side, I have not
found any comment that should avoid that it can be merged.
If nobody complains, I propose I go on and I try to merge it into
u-boot-imx. Here my first attempt:
as far as I can see, the patchset breaks mx6qsabreauto and mx35 boards.
Generally speking, it breaks boards like flea3 that define CONFIG_PHYLIB
in their config file.
undefined reference to `phy_connect_dev'
drivers/net/libnet.o: In function `fecmxc_initialize_multi':
I think the patchset assumes that boards have its own board_eth_init(),
making the required phy initialization, but most boards call only
cpu_eth_init().
Strange, my ./MAKEALL -a arm finished fine
--------------------- SUMMARY ----------------------------
Boards compiled: 297
Boards with warnings but no errors: 3 ( VCMA9 smdk2410 cam_enc_4xx )
----------------------------------------------------------
Did you apply
"[PATCH V3 5/9] phy: add phy_find_by_mask/phy_connect_dev"
I have also a general question : it seems to me that the interface for
PHY is set always to RMII - what about boards using MII ?
I could have swore that I saw a patch to fix this? But it does look
wrong currently.
But perhaps I'm thinking of 9d2d924a net: fec_mxc: Fix setting of RCR
for xMII
which doesn't change the gasket setting for mx53
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
