On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Otavio Salvador >> <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >> > I prefer to have this as is and share documentation with mx28. The >> > NAND ought to be done providing same interface so one doc for it all. >> > I think change it in next version is wrong and confuse users. >> >> Ping? >> >> We won't be able to get rid of mxsboot for NAND use-case so I'd prefer >> to have it for SD as well. For me it does not matter much as I use OE >> and it automates it all; but for ordinary user it is important to it >> to be consistent so all 'mxs' SoC would work same way from user point >> of view. >> >> If we find a better way of doing things in future we can base on this >> and improve it later but please let's get it in and move forward... > > Does my proposed patch not work for you? (the one which shifts the bootstream > payload to block 4 in partition 1)
I gave it a try today. And it works for mx23evk; I did not test it in mx28. So what is the plan? I did not check the NAND format yet to know if it is the same between mx28 and mx23 but I do want the machines merged as soon as possible so people can play with it and find bugs. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot