-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/07/2013 05:43 AM, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
[snip] >> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/spl.h:29:#define >> BOOT_DEVICE_ONE_NAND 3 >> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap5/spl.h:30:#define >> BOOT_DEVICE_ONE_NAND 4 >> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap4/spl.h:30:#define >> BOOT_DEVICE_ONE_NAND 4 >> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/spl.h:30:#define >> BOOT_DEVICE_ONE_NAND 4 >> >> For me, also looks better use ONENAND, but then, I need to >> change all these defines. What do you prefer ? Maintain the use >> of ONE_NAND or change these defines ? >> > > Before sending version 2. Any comment on this ? I can use > BOOT_DEVICE_ONE_NAND or I should change for BOOT_DEVICE_ONENAND ? The technology is ONENAND right? Lets just fix the other defines. - -- Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRE6nEAAoJENk4IS6UOR1WskMP/32YG6VBMqSYrWe0paqJcBp2 qqgZenowzgekLuKWk0U+yk/uBOm2WbiEPlcelQZ5dMCpX7PdrApogKrAU5zoCpsc ktnWNXiM4bqvhKIsIDQlf8MnEakjhOJiQ6EgJjxX/JxLR/WDs1N6ChwNKYBEubxp VRmgYxooDtK9zNNDueLoufzwfMHp7bCfQbbaLwli+45FTgmjSqCA3k1eBJ3fPQyp WX5iPFHY6MDWLi+KSzrZd94EVkr3TXt4fAqR345RI9zsZCHTeriPbsmsVVp8E3fg My/xUpOrTLLWT50qcphU1xZbtw4V0ZPBZ5DypSt/KMejHbukNaosJXWr+6qLHxkd DEoxFY7wRKcyOXOtdemgKosvgFvLbMFZAQ4y/9bTDBRGCXDZmf++kJxTXsnDmUz6 /dzJ6GRrnbzPaa001YPGPhfad+Nh84jr2NFH/gdfGeIP/E5SmuE5CXsGEhlNdgi2 ZV68UNB9CmC9mwlpmhSVScL6CewkMgrDkGWpZ/xfoiQ7Y6et0JOdn1BvqgxgZ2LO HSPD99gKBQaCLghatBW7J0n3MbzWb2x70Bwf/+sHKTtfKsHVscWjmKgU8xC7IpBk FDrkFtlCe6qcN9u2xpaqzRXQZWKV18MXF90bqRNBEqY33gFSSVwkXqMAt2tdrCrF d+zKFZdXvJLchjWNoySY =s8l3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot