On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 13:38 -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 02:46:57PM -0800, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Luka Perkov [mailto:l...@openwrt.org] > > > Sent: 11 February 2013 02:08 > > > To: Sebastian Hesselbarth > > > Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Rabeeh Khoury; Albert > > > Aribaud; Andy Fleming; Joe Hershberger; Daniel Stodden > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Add Marvell Dove and SolidRun CuBox > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:43:00AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > > > u-boot has kwboot for kirkwood since ages, but the general > > > functionality > > > > to boot through UART boot mode also applies to above SoCs. I took > > > > kwbimage to reflect that kwboot should be used for booting this > > > image. > > > > IMHO introducing new abbreviated image names like dvbimage will just > > > > distract people from using the correct tool to boot it. kwboot will > > > not > > > > be renamed, will it? > > > > > > I don't mind if we rename kwboot to lets say mvebu-boot. That name > > > would > > > fit for kirkwood, dove and armada SoCs in the future... > > > > That's good idea. > > I vote for renaming kwboot as "mvboot", that will inline with predefined > > file naming strategy. > > Is kwboot practically extensible to mmp and pxa?
If those have a similar mechanism, and it happens to be based on Xmodem, then there's probably sharable ground. The boot message protocol on Marvell chips is a fairly ad-hoc construct. Daniel _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
