On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Otavio Salvador > <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >> The i.MX23 just one USB port so we shouldn't mess up with PLL1CTRL and > > I think "MX23 has just one USB port" would be better. > >> -int ehci_hcd_init(int index, struct ehci_hccr **hccr, struct ehci_hcor >> **hcor) >> +static void soc_ehci_hcd_enable_clock(void) > > Since this is mxs specific a better name would be: mxs_ehci_hcd_enable_clock
I did it but mxs gives the impression it does mostly the same in both socs; as the code is mostly different between both I choose soc so it is clear it is for the soc it is being build. That was my thought... what do you think? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
