Dear Otavio Salvador, In message <cap9odkqs5fsw+nvqznvm6+4vvk6jfc1vd6ezqfumdkvxzcq...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > > Careful!! This is probably changing behaviour of a number of boards > > significantly. > > > > we have to check if we really want this, and if yes, we have to > > announce it and provide a grace period (eventually using > > doc/feature-removal-schedule.txt ?) > > It seems the CONFIG_BOOTDELAY as < 0 is not very common:
You do not know all the many out-of-tree ports... [OK, we don't care much about these, true...] > ~/hacking/u-boot% git grep CONFIG_BOOTDELAY | egrep 'BOOTDELAY\s* \-[0-9]' > include/configs/RPXsuper.h:#define CONFIG_BOOTDELAY -1 > include/configs/ep8260.h:#define CONFIG_BOOTDELAY -1 > include/configs/espt.h:#define CONFIG_BOOTDELAY -1 > include/configs/scb9328.h:#define CONFIG_BOOTDELAY -1 > include/configs/sh7763rdp.h:#define CONFIG_BOOTDELAY -1 > > So maybe those could have CONFIG_BOOTDELAY undefined keeping them > working as before? Yes, they could. But it is a change of a long-standing behaviour, and we try to avoid breaking existing boards. At minimum this needs to be announced, the respective board maintainers need to be modified, and given sufficient time to react. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things." - Doug Gwyn _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
