On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:06:01AM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote:
> > Dear Tom,
> >
> > In message <51216721.1010...@ti.com> you wrote:
> >>
> >> There's another thread I don't have yet (and I don't have this one in
> >> gmail yet even).  But, I am OK with custodians using their repos, but
> >> not the master branch, for unrelated but otherwise good patches. I'm
> >> also fine with patchwork bundles.  I suppose we could use the staging
> >> repository for these changes instead.
> >
> > What I mostly object about there is that these patches would go into
> > mainline basicly unreviewed, as patch submission and pull request is
> > all done from a single person, with no other feedback on the patches
> > at all.  And this affects a lot of common code...
> >
> > Actually, I see this change when pulling u-boot-x86.git/master:
> >
> > -> bloat-o-meter u-boot-before u-boot
> 
> What board is this please?
> 
> Some specific notes here - I think it boils down to moving crc32 into
> the hash framework. This adds some overhead, but has a few benefits.

So you're going to v2 this part?

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to