On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:06:01AM -0800, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > > Dear Tom, > > > > In message <51216721.1010...@ti.com> you wrote: > >> > >> There's another thread I don't have yet (and I don't have this one in > >> gmail yet even). But, I am OK with custodians using their repos, but > >> not the master branch, for unrelated but otherwise good patches. I'm > >> also fine with patchwork bundles. I suppose we could use the staging > >> repository for these changes instead. > > > > What I mostly object about there is that these patches would go into > > mainline basicly unreviewed, as patch submission and pull request is > > all done from a single person, with no other feedback on the patches > > at all. And this affects a lot of common code... > > > > Actually, I see this change when pulling u-boot-x86.git/master: > > > > -> bloat-o-meter u-boot-before u-boot > > What board is this please? > > Some specific notes here - I think it boils down to moving crc32 into > the hash framework. This adds some overhead, but has a few benefits.
So you're going to v2 this part? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot