On 02/25/2013 12:19:54 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Implement u-boot.nand target that can be reused with a small amount of
churn across all CPU models. The idea is to delegate the u-boot.nand target out of the main Makefile and into the CPU's Makefile (very similar to what u-boot.imx does now). The main Makefile shall only contain path to which the u-boot.nand target is delegated. Hopefully this will not produce too much
bloat in the main Makefile.

To demonstrate this implementation, add u-boot.nand target for i.MX53.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
Cc: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaud...@advansee.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com>
Cc: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de>
---
 Makefile                     |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/imx-common/Makefile |    6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 41054b7..8b1010a 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -470,6 +470,23 @@ $(obj)u-boot.img:  $(obj)u-boot.bin
 $(obj)u-boot.imx: $(obj)u-boot.bin depend
$(MAKE) -C $(SRCTREE)/arch/arm/imx-common $(obj)u-boot.imx

+#
+# Generic u-boot.nand target.
+#
+# Every CPU that needs u-boot.nand must add a path to an implementation of
+# the actual u-boot.nand generator below.
+#
+ifdef CONFIG_MX53
+CONFIG_NAND_TRG_PATH := $(SRCTREE)/arch/arm/imx-common
+endif
+
+$(obj)u-boot.nand: $(obj)u-boot.bin depend
+ if [ "X$(CONFIG_NAND_TRG_PATH)X" = "XX" ] ; then \ + echo "This CPU does not support u-boot.nand target!" ; \ + exit 1 ; \
+               fi
+               $(MAKE) -C $(CONFIG_NAND_TRG_PATH) $(obj)u-boot.nand

We already have CONFIG_SPL_TARGET. Why do we need a new mechanism specific to NAND, with ifdefs in the main Makefile?

If we do have something specific to NAND, it should be u-boot-nand.bin to match what nand_spl produced, and it should just be a generic rule that links to what CONFIG_SPL_TARGET produced, if the right CONFIG symbol is set by the board config to say that this is a NAND SPL. Or is someone going to say that they want to generate multiple different SPL images from the same build? :-P

-Scott
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to