On 07/03/2013 20:19, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/07/2013 10:24 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: >> On 26/02/2013 23:28, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> >>> >>> Now that U-Boot has common CONFIG_ options to work around some ARM CPU >>> errata, enable the relevant options on MX6, and remove the custom >>> lowlevel_init.S, since it's just duplicated code now. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> >>> --- >> >> Hi Stephen, >> >> applied to u-boot-imx. It is not effective until Alber apply 1/3, but it >> does not hurt. > > If you do that, then won't the imx6-specific WAR code be removed before > the generic implementation is added, so that there will be a period > where the WAR won't be enabled?
You're right - there is a period where it is not enabled. I hope it is quite short, and I will track this patchset to check when flows into u-boot-arm. > I suppose if you send your pull request > after Albert has merged the generic implementation there won't be an > issue in u-boot-arm, but until u-boot-imx picks up the latest > u-boot-arm, the issue will exist there. Right - there is some "grey zone" when a patchset belongs to different areas. My supposition (please correct if I am wrong) is that this patchset is ready to be merged and will not require another iteration, and I do not want to delay it while expecting something from my side. When Albert will pick it up the rest, everything will be fine. Stefano -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sba...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot