On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:56:34AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/13/2013 09:35 AM, Beno??t Th??baudeau wrote: > > Hi Stefano, > > > > On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:01:47 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > >> On 08/03/2013 15:54, Fabio Estevam wrote: > >>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I think the giant list from Benoit got lost. It's a HUGE > >>>> thing to change. I think we should just accept that config > >>>> variables are mixed case, or at least not block this patch on > >>>> a very large unrelated fixup. > >>> > >>> Agreed. Benoit's patch series contains 30 patches and it is at > >>> version 9. > >>> > >>> It would be better to treat this fixup seperately. > >>> > >> > >> Agree with you, this is my proposal to go on. I think we can also > >> try to split patches for area of competence, with patchsets for > >> i.MX, for ARM and for general. And maybe merging patches that are > >> laready passed the review. > >> > >> For that, patches 1 until 9 are related to i.MX and mainly to the > >> NAND for i.MX. They get already Scott's ACK. IMHO they are > >> independent from the rest of the patchset and they can be merged > >> now. My proposal is that I merge this part and for the next > >> iteration the number of patches will be reduced ;-) > >> > >>> Currently mx31pdk is broken in mainline and Benoit's series > >>> fixes it, so hopefully this can make into 2013.04. > >> > >> Let's see what we can do ;-) > > > > Yes, it could be split as you suggest, but it has already been > > reviewed and tested by several people, so I'm not sure if we still > > have to wait for anything before applying. Albert seemed to agree > > for this v9 for the arm bits, but he has not given his formal ack > > yet. Albert, is everything OK for you? > > > > The sooner it is applied, the longer people will have to test > > before the release. > > I am not going to insist that the N different parts come in from N > different trees, as long as the relevant acks are present (and it > sounds like they are). I will give the whole series another read > today just to be sure there's nothing popping out at me.
I've given everything a read-over and nothing jumps out at me. I also threw it (with a few imx things failing so I skipped) onto master and built and booted my am335x_evm with it, so for the series: Tested-by: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> And if Albert is happy, I'm happy to see it all come via u-boot-arm. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot