On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:39:31AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message <20130320195919.GR25919@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > > OK, so this does sound like a real need / use for it, and if we added > > the granularity of CONFIG_CMD_CACHE_FLUSH or similar, it would be > > reasonable to turn it on to a large number of boards for a small space > > savings (so lets not). My next concern is that this needs build testing > > Not really. Only a tiny fraction of users will ever run any standalone > applications, so please let's save the memory footprint for the > overwhelming majority of users who do not need that.
Well, can we run into this problem on ARM (v7 or v8) systems as well? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
