Hi Stephen, On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > On 03/19/2013 01:01 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Allen, >> >> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Allen Martin <amar...@nvidia.com> wrote: >>> This feature was only used for tegra20 seaboard that had a pinmux >>> conflict on the SPI pins. These boards were never manufactured, so >>> remove this support to clean up SPI driver. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Allen Martin <amar...@nvidia.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-tegra/board.h | 3 +- >>> .../arm/include/asm/arch-tegra20/uart-spi-switch.h | 46 ------- >>> board/nvidia/common/board.c | 3 - >>> board/nvidia/common/common.mk | 1 - >>> board/nvidia/common/uart-spi-switch.c | 125 >>> -------------------- >>> board/nvidia/seaboard/seaboard.c | 2 +- >>> drivers/spi/tegra_spi.c | 25 +--- >>> 7 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 202 deletions(-) >>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-tegra20/uart-spi-switch.h >>> delete mode 100644 board/nvidia/common/uart-spi-switch.c >> >> OK, maybe I need to get the T114 booting and stop using the seaboard? > > Seaboard still works perfectly after this patch (or should; I assume > Allen tested it!). The only issue is that you can't use SPI; the > assumption being that you store the BCT/bootloader in eMMC rather than > SPI and hence have no need to use SPI. SPI can be tested on other > Tegra20 board designs, such as TrimSlice (or perhaps Kaen/Aebl if > they're still around!)
OK that's no problem I think. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
