On Tuesday 26 March 2013 06:55 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 15:01-20130326, Sricharan R wrote:
>> approach we will end up creating a new tps659038.h which does exactly
>> the same thing. This does not feel correct. Can't we differentiate
>>  using register names that are passed instead ?
> tps659038/twl6035/twl6037 all belong to palmas family of PMICs. So, how about
> renaming the file to palmas.c and use palmas_i2c_read/write functions?
> 
Yes, sounds good.

Regards,
 Sricharan
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to