Dear Amar, On 05/12/12 22:31, Amar wrote: > The current implementation of fifo size computation was giving improper > values for eMMC channel. Modified the computation as per user manual. > > Signed-off-by: Amarendra Reddy <amarendra...@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c > index 4070d4e..62dc152 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c > @@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc) > dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_BMOD, 1); > > fifo_size = dwmci_readl(host, DWMCI_FIFOTH); > + fifo_size = ((fifo_size & RX_WMARK(0xFFF)) >> 16) + 1;
The definition of RX_WMARK is missing. > + > if (host->fifoth_val) > fifoth_val = host->fifoth_val; > else > Thanks, Minkyu Kang. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
