On 04/05/2013 02:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On 04/05/2013 04:50 PM, York Sun wrote: >> When we copy code/data to the main memory, we may need to flush >> the cache if required by architecture. It uses the existing >> function flush_cache. Syntax is > >> flush <addr> <size> > >> The addr and size are given in hexadecimal. Like memory command, >> there is no sanity check for the parameters. > >> Signed-off-by: York Sun <york...@freescale.com> --- Change since >> v2: rename flush_cache to flush > > Wait, why? flush_cache was clear as to what we were doing, flush less > so. At least that's my first reaction. >
Scott suggested the underscore is not recommended for the command name. Shall I change it to cacheflush or flushcache? York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot