From: Holger Brunck <holger.bru...@keymile.com>

Due to the new I2C framework we need to adapt the u-boot update
function. Due to the new framework all i2c leafs behind a mux are
present in the system and not only those who are defined and used. So it
is bus number 5 after the rework.

Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.bru...@keymile.com>
cc: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de>
cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafu...@marvell.com>

---
- changes for v4:
  new in v4
---
 include/configs/km/km_arm.h | 3 ++-
 1 Datei geändert, 2 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 1 Zeile entfernt(-)

diff --git a/include/configs/km/km_arm.h b/include/configs/km/km_arm.h
index ebbfa84..4da54d5 100644
--- a/include/configs/km/km_arm.h
+++ b/include/configs/km/km_arm.h
@@ -295,7 +295,8 @@ int get_scl(void);
 #else
 #define CONFIG_KM_NEW_ENV                                              \
        "newenv=setenv addr 0x100000 && "                               \
-               "i2c dev 1; mw.b ${addr} 0 4 && "                       \
+               "i2c dev " __stringify(CONFIG_I2C_ENV_EEPROM_BUS) "; "  \
+               "mw.b ${addr} 0 4 && "                                  \
                "eeprom write " __stringify(CONFIG_SYS_DEF_EEPROM_ADDR) \
                " ${addr} " __stringify(CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET) " 4 && "     \
                "eeprom write " __stringify(CONFIG_SYS_DEF_EEPROM_ADDR) \
-- 
1.7.11.7

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to