On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:39:54PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> From: Sricharan R <r.sricha...@ti.com>
> 
> SGX clocks should be enabled only for OMAP5 ES1.0.
> So this can be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricha...@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c |    6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c 
> b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c
> index 604fa42..842cf27 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c
> @@ -383,12 +383,6 @@ void enable_basic_clocks(void)
>                        clk_modules_explicit_en_essential,
>                        1);
>  
> -     /* Select 384Mhz for GPU as its the POR for ES1.0 */
> -     setbits_le32((*prcm)->cm_sgx_sgx_clkctrl,
> -                     CLKSEL_GPU_HYD_GCLK_MASK);
> -     setbits_le32((*prcm)->cm_sgx_sgx_clkctrl,
> -                     CLKSEL_GPU_CORE_GCLK_MASK);
> -
>       /* Enable SCRM OPT clocks for PER and CORE dpll */
>       setbits_le32((*prcm)->cm_wkupaon_scrm_clkctrl,
>                       OPTFCLKEN_SCRM_PER_MASK);

Wait, will everyone with ES1.0 be updating to ES2.0 and be OK with this?
Lubomir's board is ES1.0, currently.  Thanks!

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to