Dear Simon,

In message <CAPnjgZ2a+qrsPWTz5Y=48m_lcrqaiky0-sejudw8ay5asdw...@mail.gmail.com> 
you wrote:
> 
> > I think this is not a good way to address this issue.  The GCC
> > documentation (section "System-specific Predefined Macros" [1])
> > desribes how this should be handled.  The "correct" (TM) way to fix
> > this is by adding "-ansi" or any "-std" option that requests strict
> > conformance to the compiler/preprocessor command line.
> >
> > [1] 
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/System_002dspecific-Predefined-Macros.html#System_002dspecific-Predefined-Macros
> 
> Stephen suggested a slightly more extreme version too - I was worried
> that all the typing stuff in U-Boot headers would break in this case,
> but I didn't actually test it, so perhaps it is fine.

Yes, I've seen it.  I think either approach is better that manually
undef-ing specific variables.  From my personal point of view I think
the -undef approach is a bit of overkill, but I would not protest.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
panic: can't find /
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to