On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Richard Retanubun <richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com> wrote: > On 14/06/13 09:09 AM, Axel Lin wrote: >> >> 2013/6/14 Jagan Teki<jagannadh.t...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> IMHO: >>> Can you please use the proper commit header prefix. >>> >>> I am just sharing my thoughts, ignore this if you know it already. >>> I followed below syntax. >>> "<main_module>:<sub_module>:<sub_sub_module>:<COMMIT_HEADER>" >>> >>> Ex: for this commit (seems like this commit changes two drivers) >>> spi: cf_qspi | mxc_spi: Use DIV_ROUND_UP at appropriate places >> >> >> This does not scale. >> What if a (trivial) patch touches 10 drivers? > > Depends how trivial it is I guess. I can see benefits to both approaches. > > This one is simple enough that I am okay if it is grouped. > > Just for my own education, how do I correctly ACK just the part I know > (mcf_qspi in this case) in a grouped patch? > Is there a way to automate my "Signed-off-by:" via e-mail?
Usually normal mail server like gmail or outlook doesn' update these s-o-b or a-b use thunderbread mail logic, that will automate when u did these changes. -- Thanks, Jagan. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
