-----Original Message----- From: Wood Scott-B07421 Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 6:33 AM To: Zhang Ying-B40530 Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; aflem...@gmail.com; Xie Xiaobo-R63061; Zhang Ying-B40530 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7 v6] nand: tpl : introduce the TPL based on the SPL
On 06/26/2013 02:18:31 AM, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote: > From: Ying Zhang <b40...@freescale.com> > > Due to the nand SPL on some board(e.g. P1022DS)has a size limit, it > can > not be more than 4K. So, the SPL cannot initialize the DDR with the > SPD > code. This patch introduces TPL to enable a loader stub that runs in > the > L2 SRAM, after being loaded by the code from the SPL. It initializes > the > DDR with the SPD or other operations. > > The TPL's size is sizeable, the maximum size must not exceed the size > of L2 > SRAM. Using L2 SRAM for this is an implementation detail, and not appropriate for a description of the generic TPL infrastructure. For example, on newer QorIQ chips you'd be using CPC (L3) SRAM. > It initializes the DDR through SPD code, and copys final uboot image > to DDR. So there are three stage uboot images: > * spl_boot, * tpl_boot, * final uboot image, > > This patch is on top of the patch: > SPL : spi flash : support to start from eSPI with SPL You don't need to mention a dependency on an earlier patch in the same patchset (and when you do need to mention a dependency, it should be below the --- line so it doesn't go into the git history). OTOH, you do need to mention the dependency on the patch to have a separate autoconf.mk. [Zhang Ying] I want to know when the patch that creates a separate autoconf.mk can be merged? My patch need to be verified on the basis of it. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot